?

Log in

No account? Create an account

October 12th, 2009

A BOVINE ABDUCTION CASE INVESTIGATED



1.bp.blogspot.com/_tlidr95gRew/StMa-pElgxI/AAAAAAAAA5I/WlnFTK3oeE0/s1600-h/Cow+UFO+Analysis+001.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tlidr95gRew/StMa-7Zsc-I/AAAAAAAAA5Q/3fGq-LqPNgA/s1600-h/Cow+UFO+Analysis+002.jpg

On 10/12/09, Scott Corrales  wrote me:
> INEXPLICATA - The Journal of Hispanic Ufology
> October 12, 2009
>
 Argentina:Cow Abducted by UFO - An Analysis
 By Silvia Pérez Simondini

>
>
> “There Can Be No Better Proof”
>
> Many years ago, ever since 2002, VISION OVNI was expecting evidence such as
> this, simply because it is one of the most analyzed hypotheses that our team
> has worked with, since no traces of blood are ever found next to the
> mutilated animals, certainly indicating that animals were not being
> mutilated on site. Rather, they were being removed to another location, and
> evidently, no black helicopters were involved – only UFOs, unidentified
> flying object.
>
> At this point in time I would like to know what happened to the red-muzzled
> mouse, what became of the famous Chupacabras, the yellow jacket, and the
> other explanations put forth by officialdom to dodge the subject of
> mutilations.
>
> Personally speaking, I am more than pleased, as the number of animals seen
> by our team over the years deserved knowing that at least someone tried to
> find an answer to their deaths. And these answers came from a phenomenon we
> never dismissed out of hand, but rather, we always knew was the result of
> unknown hands, regardless of their origin.
>
> We continue our research, but with a broader concept in mind, and if all
> certifications give us certainty that there can be no doubts whatsoever, we
> shall then be faced with a reality that is impossible to deny: the existence
> of an anomaly in space, capable of doing such things with utter impunity.
>
> Field Research by Elias and Daysee Kolev
>
> On September 8, 2009, members of VISION OVNI interviewed the witnesses of an
> extremely important event within UFO research.
>
> On September 5, 2009, the couple made up of Laura, Sergio and her 7 year-old
> son were in Puerto Gaboto on the banks of the Coronada River during the
> afternoon, enjoying a visit. At a given moment the saw something over the
> island that drew their attention.
>
> This is the eyewitness account:
>
> “We were drinking mate with our son, when they saw something white in the
> air toward the island. When they looked through the photo camera’s zoom
> lens, they saw it was a cow and above it, something like a flying saucer
> suspended in the air. A distance of some 30 meters separated the cow from
> the saucer when the sighting occurred.”
>
> According to their story, it was clearly evident that the saucer-shaped
> vehicle was “absorbing the cow”. Suddenly, both the cow and the vessel
> vanished from sight. It wasn’t a helicopter or any known type of aircraft.
> Those were their comments.
>
>

> When we asked if the animal made any movements whatsoever, we were told that
> there was the sensation that the animal was completely relaxed or
> unconscious, that it made no movement whatsoever. The duration of the
> sighting from beginning to end was from 17:22 to 17:30 hours (8 minutes) and
> this time is recorded in the sequence of photos.
> The river is between 60 to 80 meters wide at that point, says Sergio.
> The photos show several animals on the island.
> According to residents of this island region, mutilated cows have been found
> on several occasions.
> The camera with which the photos were taken is a Sony DSC-W70. According to
> the reports of Channel 3 in Rosario, when inspecting the camera, a series of
> photos taken earlier were found along with the ones of the case. In each of
> these photo files, the header placed by the camera manufacturer is visible –
> Sony, in this case – and the date and time in which they were taken also
> appears. Therefore, unless some sophisticated technical work was involved,
> these are original, unretouched photos.
>
> For Visión Ovni .
> Daysee and Elias Kolev
> CEFORA
> Visión Ovni
> Rosario- Santa Fe
>
> Photo Analysis
>
> Up to now we have retold the recorded testimony of the eyewitnesses; the
> analysis yields the following results:
>
> CAMERA Employed:
> SONY DSC-W170 10.1 megapixels.
> Image resolution as per the respective images analyzed.
> No modification or divergence was found regarding the subsequent editing
> information (enlargement) of the originals, using the same camera.
>
>
> IMAGES:
>
> THE BOVINE
> 1)    Objects shown in the images do not display digital manipulation in the
> adjoining pixels.
> 2)    There is a correspondence between brilliance and angle regarding the
> light source (the sun)
> 3)    In non-destructive super-resolution processes applied to the image, the
> animal turned out to be a bovine with its right side toward the camera, its
> head hanging to the left.
> 4)    It can be deduced that the animal photographed in the air was either
> lifeless or in a deep stupor, judging from its observed condition.
> 5)    We have managed to see its hooves, tail and head.
> 6)    The 3d analysis is self-evident.
>

> DISTANCES INVOLVED
> According to the eyewitnesses, they were a maximum of 60 to 80 meters from
> where the events took place, at the watercourse of the Coronada River where
> it meets the Caracaña.
>
> THE OBJECT:
> 1)    In the opinion of this analyst, it had a diameter of between 8 to 10
> meters and perhaps some 2.40 to 3 meters tall.
> 2)    Some sort of beam was captured by the camera, and we perhaps cannot
> appreciate it in its entirety due to some sort of camouflage, subsequently
> corroborate by the account.
> 3)    Applying filters, we can see that the UFO emitted perhaps high-ionization
> heat in its upper and lower sections.
> 4)    Volumetric analysis shows that it was a disk-shaped object whose
> brilliance corresponded to that of the sun.
> 5)    It is surrounded by some sort of triangular element and another circular
> one, or otherwise, plasma that the camera did not record in another shape.
> 6)    I highlight that the resolution of the images generates a lot of noise in
> the captures and implies a greater processing time.
> 7)    Insects were present in the photo shoot, but not in these 4 main ones.
>
> Conclusion – the digital document is to my understanding a complete and
> accurate one. (Analysis performed by Salvatore Valentin Carta – Santa Rosa –
> La Pampa – Argentina – CEFORA)

> (Translation (c) 2009, S. Corrales, IHU. Special thanks to Silvia Pérez
> Simondini and the members of VISION OVNI)

Latest Month

October 2019
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow